This
talk today is devoted to the status and perspectives of Islam in modern Russia.
Islam’s history on the landmass now called Russia goes back centuries, even
further than Christianity, and I would like to highlight one major fact from
this, in my opinion the most significant.
That is
that not only the Caucasus or the Turkic regions, but almost all of Russia’s
historic territories, is a “Dar ul Islam”. In 1313 Khan Uzbek declared the
sharia as state law over the Territory of the Golden Horde, which included the
territories of modern Russia. And as we know, any land that was a Dar ul Islam
cannot be treated the same, by Muslims, as other territories.
There
is great potential for Islam in Russia which we can link to three main factors:
-
1) From
the 140 million Russian citizens, 20 million of them historically belong to
the Islamic Umma.
-
2) Geopolitically,
Russia is interested in unity with the Islamic world as a deterrent to
American Hegemony. Russian relations with Muslim countries are in active
development, and a few years ago, Russia became a supervisor for the Islamic
Conference Organisation.
-
3) Since
the fall of communism, more and more indigenous Russians, dissatisfied with
democracy, and not believing in Christianity as a social alternative, have
turned towards Islam as the only salvation for Russia, and today,
thousands of Russians are adopting Islam. IN 2004, the National Organization
of Russian Muslims was formed in order to unite these Muslims.
However, in spite of these facts, the modern status of Islam in Russia is poor
for a country with such potential.
1) The
Muslims do not have representatives in the media and among the political class.
2) In
general, Russian society is suspicious towards the Muslims and in most cases,
practicing Muslims are under pressure from the social sphere, with law
enforcement bodies considering any Islamic activity as a potential threat. Many
Islamic books have been prohibited, including the Sira of the Prophet , s.a.s
and many Muslims have emigrated under fear of being arrested.
3) This
Islamophobia is hindering relations between Russia and the Islamic World.
It
looks strange because Russia’s leaders, especially Putin, have declared that
they are friends of Islam, and even that Russia is part of the Islamic World.
The question is, what is the reason for the contradiction between these
declarations and the real policies of the State beaurocracy and the mass media?
Some of
the reasons are to be found inside the political government of Russia, and
others inside the Muslim community itself. From one side we are seeing the wish
of Vladimir Putin to restore the political sovereignty and power of Russia, from
the other side there is total corruption among the State-party beaurocracy which
is blocking all projects for the development of Russia.
We also
see the policies of liberal economists, making Russia – the richest country in
the world in resources – the hostage of bankruptcy of the global financial
system. All these political classes instinctively feel the threat of Islam.
And
what about the Muslims themselves?
The Islamic Umma in Russia
We
should note that the weakness of the Umma in Russia in many ways can be
explained by ideological misunderstandings among Russian Muslims, because during
the time of the Soviets, traditional Islamic teaching was destroyed. Thousands
of ulema were killed or thrown out of the country, leading to the current
situation where there are almost no real authoritative people whom the Muslims
can gather themselves around.
The
spiritual departments of Muslims, the main Islamic structures in Russia, are not
ideological, but are in essence bureaucratic institutes. The self-declared
Muslim publicity calls to political Islam, but a political Islam as a
unification of Muslims and shi’as, Sufis and salafis, which is of course a false
unity.
They
spread the modernist ideology of Al-Azhar and the likes, as well as a general
disorientation among Muslims. They are responsible for the growing influence of
the shi’a, willingly giving them a platform.
As for
the actual ideological tendencies between Muslims and so-called Muslims in
Russia, there are four main directions.
The
first is pro-governmental and apolitical salafism, which is in strong conflict
with the second direction, salafist-jihadists, who are calling for the
separation of the Muslim regions of Volga and the Caucasus from Russia. The
other two directions are with the correct Muslims, and the shi’a, who represent
a post-Islamic religion. These four groups are waging an ideological war, in
which one side is yet to triumph.
And
finally we have to mention the geopolitical dimension among the Muslims. The
Muslims have two main positions towards Russia. The first is that Russia is a
state hostile to Islam, where Muslims have no prospects, and therefore Muslim
lands must be separated from it. That is the position of the armed separatists,
popular among the radical youth.
The
second position is that there must be a strong Muslim community inside of Russia
in order to support this great power as a potentially important partner of the
Islamic Umma. However, the majority of Muslims who hold such a position
understand Islam as a religion of the ethnic minority in opposition to the main
body of Russians, who make up 80% of Russia.
The
only Islamic organization representing another position is the National
Organization of Russian Muslims. We declare that in Russia there must be a
strong community of Russian Muslims that do not oppose themselves to the Russian
nation state. Because in Russia the best way to leave the nation state in the
past is to let it first become established.
The
perspectives of Islam in Russia
In my
opinion, this goal can be realized under the following conditions:
1) The
creation and development of the Islamic communities, that is preparing educated
leaders, imams and ulema who can lead the Muslim community through difficult
political conditions.
2) Creating
the correct political position of leading Islamic structures towards the nation
state requires leaders who understand the interests of the main population.
3) After
this, the restructured national Islamic society will break the informal blockade
and counteract the discrimination of the Muslims. It will become a body that
provides loyalty to the nation, and in return the government will secure the
rights of Muslims and their interests.
But we
can suppose that until the policy towards the Muslims by the Government is made
by the political class, connected with the bureaucrats and capitalists, this
policy will inherit the genetic islamophobia of past three epochs: byzantists,
communists and liberals. But we can say that the result of this policy will be
the fault of the attempts of Vladimir Putin to restore Russia as a great power.
The
Muslims of Russia, armed with the teachings of Shaykh Abdalqadir As-Sufi, can
and must suggest to Russia the solutions to both these problems. First is the
abolition of this butophoric democracy and the establishment of the
system of personal rule without the middle-man of political bureaucracy. In this
case, the Islamic community can establish direct contact with this personal
ruler and even become his main support.
It also
needs to refuse the suicidal liberal financial policy, and restore the golden
rouble, and remove usury for the economy of real wealth. There is nobody better
equipped than the Muslims to help the sovereign ruler of Russia to realise this.
And
finally, there is what Rais Abu bakr calls the creation of a new Nomos.
In my
opinion the creation of such a Nomos should mean the moving of the Russian
geopolitical centre into Siberia, and focusing Russian geopolitical activity on
the Pacific and central-Asian regions. In this case the Tatar Islamic lands will
be in the same centre of Russia, around its new capital. This will change the
geopolitical status of the Muslims inside Russia.
The
Muslims need lobbies – competent leaders, analysts and journalists able to
convey to Russian society that the Muslims are an important and integral part of
the future of Russia. On ground level there must be an environment that spawns
and moulds men into successful proponents of Islam.
This
will be possible if the Muslims of Russia hear the message of Sheikh Abdalqadir
as-Sufi, who says the following:
“If we rescue Jama’at as a centred civic entity, we can soon extend to the
larger polity.
The Muslims – diametrically opposed to the Shi’a religionists – do not give
their Zakat to the Mullahs. We have our Amirs TAKE it via their Collectors.
The worshipping Jama’at is a civic entity sustained by mutual help, given sadaqa
and counsel. Education and teaching the Deen must be our shared responsibility
and pleasure”.
Only if
we follow those recommendations will we be able to establish the ground for the
more large-scale policy.