To truly understand what is
happening today in the so-called credit crisis, we first need to understand what
happened back in 1910 when the Federal Reserve System was conceived and what the
hidden agenda of the 'founding fathers' of the Fed were. Without an
understanding of this historic background, we cannot possible comprehend the
deeper context of the ongoing crisis.
My analysis will focus on
four aspects of the Modern Financial Power System:
1. FIAT money:
how FIAT money (or money made out of nothing) comes into existence;
2. Loss of
Purchasing Power and Inflation: what effect the unlimited creation of
FIAT money has on the broader economy and ultimately on you and me;
3. Central Banks and
the Fed: the hidden agenda and objectives of the banking cartels known
as Central Banks and the Federal Reserve System;
4. Real Money and Shari’a Economics: the only viable alternative to the FIAT economy.
Please allow me some
introductory remarks:
- Even though, for
reasons of simplicity, I will focus my discussion on the US Federal
Reserve System, the same logic applies to all other Central Banks.
-
Although my
explanations seem ridiculously simple, I can assure you that they are
technically speaking 100% correct (I simply stripped out the banker’s
language)
-
Try not the make
sense out of all this because it does not make sense. Just think of
it as your basic scam and you will be able to understand it pretty
well, particularly in the light of the ongoing financial crisis which
is beginning to take on historic proportions.
-
All of what I am
going to talk about concerns you and me. It is our money and economic
well-being that are at stake, it is our money and pension funds that are
being used to bail out the banks. So listen carefully because the
well-being of yourself and your family is at stake.
-
Many aspect of my
analysis are based on the ground-breaking work by other people. In this
sense, they deserve the credit of the following analysis and not me.
1. How FIAT Money comes
into Existence
FIAT Money is money made
out of nothing and comes into being through the creation of government,
business and private debt. That is a very important fact to remember:
FIAT money is created from debt. We will later see why this is so important.
This becomes possible
through a collusion of interest between governments and the privately
owned banking cartels known as Central Banks and the Federal Reserve
System. You might rightfully wonder how it is possible to create money out of
nothing – the same money that all of us labor and sacrifice for our entire
lives.
Let us use an example to
best illustrate how FIAT money is created:
It all starts with the
government side of the equation. The government runs out of money and needs 10
billion USD to pay for its running expenses over the next few weeks. Congress
thus goes to the Treasury and asks for the money. The Treasury official tells
Congress that they must be kidding because all tax receipts have long been spent
in January and February (most of it by the way on the Fed to service the
government’s debt). But don’t worry, they say, and together they go down the
road to the Fed. Now the Fed has been waiting for them since this is one of
the reasons it has been created.
Once they arrive at the Fed,
the Fed official takes out a big check book and writes a check over 10 billion
USD to the US government. At this point, we have to ask the legitimate question
where did this money come from. The astounding answer is that there is no money,
technically speaking there is not even a checking account, there is just a check
book. This money came into being in the precise moment the Fed official signs
the check. It is therefore created out of nothing and is loaned to the
government against interest.
If you or I would do that,
we would go to jail. The Fed however can do it because Congress wants it to do
it. We will later see why.
The Treasury official then
deposits this new money in a government checking account at the Federal Reserve
System Bank (which is properly speaking not even a bank) and the government
starts to write checks to pay for its projects. Let us now follow a small
part of this money to better understand what happens on the commercial banking
side of things.
Once the money leaves the
government side of the equation, it enters mainstream banking. Let us assume,
the postman next door receives a government-issued check over 100 USD and brings
it to his commercial bank down the road. The bank official deposits the 100 USD
and goes to the loan window to announce that 100 USD have just been deposited
and the bank can now loan money. This makes everybody waiting outside the loan
window joyous because this is one of the reasons people go the bank – to loan
money. Some people are however a little concerned because it is only 100 USD
that were deposited. Do not worry the bank official says, we can loan you up to
900 USD. How is this possible?
Let me explain: this becomes
possible because the Fed has ruled that a minimum of 10% of all outstanding
loans must be kept on deposit (this is called fractional banking). Since
100% of 10% (in our case of 100 USD) is 1000 USD, the bank can thus loan up to
900 USD based on the 100 USD that were deposited earlier. At this point, we have
to ask the same legitimate question – where did this new money come from? The
amazing answer is the same – this money was created from nothing and comes into
existence at the precise moment the loan is signed by you and me.
In summary, as a result of
the government’s need for 10 billion USD, a total of 100 billion USD have
been created from nothing – all of it loaned out and collecting interest
for the banking side of the partnership. Interest on nothing!
There is however one
important difference in the use of the money loaned to the government and the
money loaned to us by the commercial banks. While the government uses this money
to pay for its projects, the banks do not use it on their projects, but loan
it to us for our projects against interest and secured by our assets. While
the large part of our profits from this nothing money thus goes back to the
banks via interest payments, the banks will take all of our assets if we fail to
pay interest on this nothing money.
While the banking side
collects perpetual interest on nothing, the fruit of our labour and sacrifice
goes back to the banks in the form of interest. Whether in times of expansion
or contraction, it does not matter: the banks always win – it was
engineered that way. If we however fail to pay interest on this nothing
money, the banks take our cars, our houses, in fact all of our assets because we
signed on the dotted line.
You might rightfully wonder
how the banks which collect perpetual interest on nothing and have the right to
our assets can possible get into trouble as they do today. The answer lies in
their excessive leverage (which is based on greed) where they loan
out too much and keep too little in reserves. If only a few percent of the
outstanding loans fail, the banks get into trouble because they cannot meet
their reserve requirements – this is exactly what is happening today and what
is falsely labelled a credit crisis. The current crisis was caused by an
overextension of leverage while the tightening of credit is simply a side-effect
of insufficient capital reserves resulting from this overextension.
For the above reason, the
whole FIAT system is a house built on cards, and any major storm can
bring it down. The higher the leverage, the higher the risk of failure.
What we witness today in the so-called credit crisis is the result of an
over-extension of leverage. This is the second important fact to remember, we
will later see why.
2. Loss of Purchasing
Power and Inflation
Let us now follow the
diffusion of this newly created money into the economy. Since FIAT money is made
out of nothing, every time new money is created and injected into the economy,
the new money ‘borrows’ its value from the existing money and thus debases it.
It is like pouring water into a pot of soup – it dilutes the soup. We
experience this as a loss of purchasing power which is the phenomenon of
inflation or, more properly speaking, the appearance of rising prices
I say appearance of rising
prices because in terms of REAL Money (namely gold and silver), prices do not
change over long periods of time. Rising prices (or inflation) are the result of
‘making money out of nothing’. In ancient Rome, a one ounce gold coin (which is
REAL Money) bought you a fine toga, a handcrafted belt and a pair of
sandals. Today, you can walk into any fine men’s store and, with a one ounce
gold coin, you can buy a fine suit, a handcrafted belt and a fine pair of shoes.
In other words, the real price of these things has not changed in
thousands of years. Real Money therefore is the best protection of
purchasing power, since it is not subject to manipulation (in other words
inflation) and thus ensures long-term price stability - something which our
central banks proclaim as their core objective and which none of them have even
remotely achieved. Quite on the contrary, our central banks, by creating an
unlimited amount of money from nothing, became the principal destructors of
purchasing power and enabled the concentration of wealth into the hands of a few
exceedingly powerful institutions and individuals (through interest on nothing)
while ensuring that everybody else gets poorer and poorer.
At this point, we have to
ask another legitimate question: did anybody get our lost purchasing power
which resulted from inflation or did it just evaporate into thin air? The
answer is: for every loser, there is a winner. Who got our lost
purchasing power? It is the people who got the money first before it was
injected into the wider economy. Who are these people? Obviously the government
who got the first check over 10 billion USD, the commercial banks which created
new money based on the new money from the government and the people lining up at
the loan window when the new money left the commercial banking side of things.
These people got our lost purchasing power. By the time most of us receive this
new money, it has already lost some of its value and is worth less and less.
The losers are always we; the winners are the government and the banks.
Through the phenomenon of
inflation or, more properly speaking, the loss of purchasing power, all FIAT
money is eventually destined for the ‘graveyard of FIAT currencies’ (as
proposed by James Turk, CEO of GoldMoney). On the other hand, REAL Money (in
other words Gold and Silver) will always maintain its value and prevail in times
of crises irrespective of governments, ideologies or place in history. Why is
this so? Because FIAT money is subject to government and central bank
manipulation whereas real money cannot be influenced by small interest groups
and is only subject to supply and demand resulting from millions of people
freely interacting with each other. This is why no interest group has ever been
able to manipulate the value of REAL Money and why government and central banks
thought it necessary to move away from REAL Money towards FIAT Money in order to
manipulate the money supply. Why? Because they needed more money than they
had access to. They thus debase the money’s purchasing power through
inflation and enable the exponential concentration of enormous WEALTH AND
POWER into the hands of a very few institutions and individuals.
No matter what anybody says,
inflation is a hidden tax. Rather than increasing our direct taxes (which
is not a popular thing to do and therefore not liked by politicians as the
current administration in the US has demonstrated abundantly), governments
prefer to take our money indirectly through inflation. This is why politicians
love the creation of money from nothing and why they are in partnership with
the banking cartel.
How can we as average
citizens best measure inflation? Certainly not through the official government
and central banks statements which put inflation consistently too low. While
the US government and the Fed have pegged inflation at a few percent per year
over the last six years, housing prices in the US have practically doubled
between 2001 and 2005. As we have seen before, rising prices are a direct
reflection of inflation or loss in purchasing power. In reality therefore,
inflation in the US has been running at well above 10% per year as opposed to
the official figures of a few percent per year we are made to believe.
Another good measure of
inflation is compound money growth (referred to as M1 to M3) .While the
European Central Bank still publishes reasonably accurate figures on compound
Money growth (above 10% per year), the Fed has stopped publishing such figures
several years back. For good reasons – they would make even simple minds
suspicious at the rate the US administration has been borrowing and creating
money from nothing.
3. The Hidden Objectives
of the Federal Reserve System
If we believe the official
doctrine, the purpose of the Central Banks and the Fed is to stabilize our
banking system and our economy. If these were indeed their true objectives, they
do a very poor job at it and have consistently failed to meet their stated
objectives.
These have however never
been their true objectives. The true objectives of the Fed were fourfold (with
the fourth objective underlying the first three) and are completely unrelated to
their publicly proclaimed objectives. They are:
I.
To consolidate and increase the power of the
big banks on Wall Street (the exact opposite of what the Fed was
supposed to achieve back in 1913)
II.
To reverse the trend towards private capital
formation thus countering a trend in the early 1900 whereby corporations
and individual were saving part of their earning to invest in future
projects.
III.
To arrange government bail-out at the
expense of the tax payers for those cartel members that get into trouble – a
process that has gone out of control in the ongoing credit crisis.
IV.
To increase their power by buying
influence through the river of unearned wealth generated by the first three
objectives
Now let us examine each of
these hidden objectives in more detail.
A. The Money Trust:
In the early 1900, the
American people and Congress were very concerned about the concentration of
financial power in New York which was commonly referred to as the ‘money
trust’. Congress set up a special committee chaired by Senator Nelson
Aldrich to come up with new banking regulations to break the ‘money trust’
and disperse financial power away from New York.
In 1910, Senator Aldrich
together with 6 other highly influential bankers representing the financial
empires of the Rockefellers, the Morgan’s, the Warburg’s and the Rothschild’s
set out on a secret journey to Jekyll island and in nine days hammered out the
fundamental principles of what would later become the Federal Reserve System. In
their time, these 7 individuals represented directly and indirectly 25% of
the entire wealth of the planet. In 1913, the first Federal Reserve Bill
which was sponsored by Senator Aldrich (who later by the way became the
grandfather of Nelson Rockefeller) was voted down in Congress because Senator
Aldrich who was the Republican Whip in the Senate was known to represent the
interest of big business.
This was however just a
minor set-back. They scrambled around the paragraphs a little bit and, on the
insistence of Paul Warburg, added some excellent provisions to the revised bill
that would seriously restrict the power of the Fed. When his colleagues asked
him: Paul, what are you doing we do not want these provisions in our bill, his
reply was classic: fellows he said, our objective is to pass the bill, we can
fix it up later. They then found two millionaire democrats to sponsor the
bill, spoke openly against the bill that they had written and got it
passed two years later by a large majority except for some lone voices.
This mainly became possible
because of these excellent provisions that were added on the insistence of Paul
Warburg which finally won over the support of Brian Jennings (the head of the
populist movement) who had previously resisted all efforts to establish a
central banking mechanism.
And they indeed did fix
it up later. Since its inception, the Federal Reserve Bill has been amended
over 100 times and all of these excellent provisions were long ago removed and
many more were added that greatly expanded the power of the Federal Reserve. As
we are witnessing today, the biggest increase in the power of the Fed is
happening right now in the context of the so-called credit crisis.
Did they achieve objective
1? Yes, they did indeed. While there are big banks in the South and the West,
these banks are nothing compared to the Megabanks in New York. So they get an A
on their scorecard.
I mentioned before that this
meeting was taking place in total secrecy. When these 7 men met for their
journey to Jekyll Island at the Hudson railway station across from Manhattan
(where senator Aldrich has sent his private railroad car for the journey), they
were instructed to come alone, not to dine with each other on the night of their
departure, not to greet each other should they meet accidentally and, once on
the train, to use first names only (two of them actually used code names to
increase the effect of camouflage). For many years after this meeting, all of
these men denied such a meeting ever took place. Only 20 years later, some of
them wrote books and articles about what happened on Jekyll Island. Why was
secrecy so important and what is wrong with some bankers going on a journey and
discussing banking regulations? Ladies and gentlemen, these were the
representatives of the Money Trust writing the Federal Reserve Bill whose
objective was to break the Money Trust! This is like inviting the fox to
build the hen house and install the security system!
As one of them confessed
many years later, should it have become known that these 7 men were meeting to
discuss banking regulations, it would have caused waves in Washington, in Wall
Street and even in London. Secrecy therefore was absolutely essential; otherwise
their Bill would have had no chance whatsoever to pass in Congress.
Before we proceed to discuss
objective 2, let us now examine in more detail the composition of the group of
people that created the Federal Reserve Bill. Around the table on Jekyll Island,
there were representatives of the Rockefellers, the Morgan’s, the Warburg’s and
the Rothschild’s. Is there something strange about the composition of this
group? Ladies and gentlemen, these were competitors. Just a few years
back, they were beating their heads, blood all over the place, fighting for
dominance in the financial markets of the world. Now these same people are
sitting peacefully around a table and coming to an agreement of some kind. Does
this arouse your curiosity? What is happening here?
To understand this better,
we need to look at American history in the late 19th and early 20th
century which was often referred to as the dawning of the cartels. US
Corporations which became big and powerful as a result of intense competition
and for this reason were outdoing their European counterparts, started to form
cartels to protect them from competition and loss of market share. It was
William Rockefeller the 1st who said: Competition is a Sin!
This brings us to the
astounding realization that the Fed is in reality a banking cartel. You
will not find this interpretation in any text book. Contrary to the objectives
of Congress who wanted to disperse and dilute financial power away from New
York, the Fed has in reality greatly increased the power of its New York
member banks. And to secure this increase in power, it has gone into
partnership with the government – something cartels often do to protect their
interest and secure their market share.
To camouflage the true
intentions behind the Federal Reserve System, they then had to come up with an
appropriate name for the sake of appearances. First they decided to call it
Federal to create the impression as if it was a government operation (which
decidedly it is not). Secondly, they added the word Reserve to make it
appear as if there were Reserves somewhere (there are no reserves anywhere) and
finally they added the word System to create the impression that it was a
system of 12 regional and equally important banks where in fact it was from the
beginning dominated by the New York cartel.
From its beginning, the
Federal Reserve System was based on secrecy, deception and misleading
appearances. It is an appearance of the 4th kind: things which are
not yet appear to be.
B. Private Capital
Formation
In the late 19th
century, corporations and individuals began to set aside part of their profits
to invest in future research and development projects. This is called private
capital formation. At that time, the banks were greatly concerned about this
trend and tried to figure out ways how to lure businesses and individuals back
into the banks to loan them money.
They realized that the only
way to do this was by lowering interest rates. You might say why didn’t
they just lower interest rates? From today’s perspective, this is a perfectly
legitimate question since the modern Fed has the power to move interest rates up
or down, completely at their discretion. In those days however, money was still
based on gold and silver and on that money there was no lever to influence
interest rates. As we have seen previously, interest rates on real money (in
other words gold and silver) were determined by supply and demand resulting from
the interactions of millions of people. It was therefore impossible for any
interest group to move interest rates up or down.
So they said that they
needed a flexible currency to better serve the interest of businesses and
individuals. What is a flexible currency? Ladies and gentlemen, a flexible
currency is money made out of nothing. With this kind of money, it is
completely in the power of Central Banks to move interest rates up or down.
This was the beginning of
fractional banking. At first, they lowered the reserve requirements in gold
and silver down by 30%, then by 60% and, under president Nixon in the early
1970, removed them altogether thereby finally creating a pure FIAT currency.
By lowering interest rates,
they were able to lure businesses and individuals back into the banks because
everybody thought it crazy not to loan money at these low rates. What people
however tend to forget is that interest rates will also go up and economies will
not just expand but also contract. And when economies contract, interest rates
tend to go up and people are pressed harder and harder to service their debt.
Did they achieve objective
number 2? Yes, they did indeed. Today, most businesses and individuals are
indebted to the hilt just barely hanging on by the flesh of their teeth.
Bankruptcies are at an all-time high, more money is spent on servicing corporate
debt than is handed out to shareholders in dividends and the whole world is in a
state of global recession.
Stock markets are collapsing
across the world, individuals and public institutions such as pension funds see
their wealth disappear faster than ever and governments incur debts at an
alarming rate.
They clearly get an A on
their report card for eliminating the trend towards private capital formation.
As a matter of fact, as we can witness in the so-called credit crisis, our
modern world is built on debt and the freezing-up of credit brings it to the
point of collapse. While governments across the planet are busy bailing out
banks, the next disaster is already looming on the horizon. As a secondary
effect to the credit crisis, large corporations loose business deals because
their customers cannot finance them, they find it increasingly difficult to meet
payroll requirements and to service their debts to the banks. These secondary
effects of corporate bankruptcies which are just around the corner will, in my
opinion, be much more severe than what we are witnessing today in the
banking sector. I am referring to the giants of the producing economy, companies
such as GM, GE and Ford.
All of what is happening
today came about because the Banking Cartel was so successful in reversing the
trend towards private capital formation. They get an A on their report card for
achieving objective 2.
3. The Game Called
"Bail-Out"
The third objective of the
Federal Reserve System is called corporate bail-out. It works like this:
if a bank is in trouble or a large corporation or third world country which owes
a lot of money to the Banking Cartel gets into trouble, the Fed goes to Congress
and tells them that they have to bail out the bank or corporation because if
they do not, thousands of Americans will loose their jobs and, who knows, the
bank is so big that, if it fails, it might act like a domino and bring down all
other banks with it. I am sure you can see the obvious parallels to what is
happening today. Just switch on the TV or open the newspaper and you will be
bombarded with the latest bail-out news from all over the world. Morgan Stanley,
AIG, Freddie Mac, HBOS, Bank of Scotland to just name a few.
Since Congress does not want
to be responsible for all of these horrible things to happen, they begin to use
tax payers’ money to bail out the banks and corporations in trouble. The game
called bail-out which started on a small scale in the early 1970 has since then
taken on historic proportions and consumes funds which we cannot even begin to
imagine – the zeros simply become too numerous to count.
As we have painfully learned
over the last few months, the European governments have just pledged 2.7
trillion USD of our money to support their ailing banking system while the
US government has already spent some 300 billion USD on their crumbling
financial companies and has pledge an additional 700 billions to be spent
in the near future. Without even considering the commitments by the Russian and
other governments, these figures are by any measure staggering, but will not
even be closely enough to contain the current crisis (as the free-falling stock
markets around the world clearly demonstrate). Once the full impact of the
credit crisis will hit the giants of the producing economy such as GM or GE,
corporate failures will grow exponentially and no government, irrespective of
its fiscal policies and financial power, will be able to contain the mess
and stop these companies from going under. At that point, the current credit
crisis (which is still reasonably contained) will begin to mushroom into
a global economic meltdown.
And the reason for all of
this is the use of excessive leverage and the greed of the big banks.
While the governments bail out the culprits of this historic disaster without
even punishing them, we are the ones footing the bill through massive
inflation.
And nobody is on the
barricades protesting – no revolution anywhere in sight. What is happening –
are we all going to take it lying down or are we getting up to fight for our
rights, our lives and the lives of our children? Ladies and gentlemen, it is
time to wake up. If we wait much longer, there will be nothing left worth
fighting for.
They did indeed do a
marvellous job at deceiving us and get an A on their scorecard for achieving
objective 3.
D. Usury as the Key to
Power – The Core of FIAT Banking
Let us use a simple example
to best illustrate usury and the effect it has on you and me and the world
economy at large:
When analyzing the
construction of a house where 30k USD are used for the purchase of the land and
architect fees and 70k USD go to the builder, we assume that the owner would
then make a down payment of 20k USD and would borrow 80k USD on a 30 year
mortgage at fixed interest of 10%. After we calculate that the bank will thus
earn 172k USD in interest payments on money made out of nothing (which
represents 2.5 times of what the builder gets for all the material and labour),
we must conclude that this is clearly excessive and that any kind of interest
on any loan of FIAT money should therefore be forbidden.
You might argue that one
should not forget the time value of money given the long period of 30
years during which the banks cannot use this money and the work and sacrifice
that went into saving it. But not this money ladies and gentlemen: nobody worked
or sacrificed for this money - this money was created from nothing.
You now have to multiply
this with every house, every factory, every office building, every personal,
corporate and government loan, every warehouse, every farm equipment, every
ship, every airplane, every investment and you come up with a vast river of
unearned wealth which is perpetually flowing into a gigantic lake of
unimaginable wealth.
You might think these people
get richer and richer and richer. Not so. This is not the purpose of this money.
This money is used to purchase influence and power. Once you have all the
money you can possibly spend in a lifetime, what is left? Power! They do not buy
the hardware, they buy influence. They use this money to buy the people and
organizations that we depend on for advice and leadership. They buy governments,
publishing houses, newspapers, movie industries, public interest groups, NGOs,
political organizations, consumer groups, boy scouts, girl scouts – you name it.
Any organization that exercises any form of influence is a target for control.
And the process has already progressed at an alarming rate and will soon be
complete.
In the so-called third
world, this process has already been completed. These governments have
already been bought outright and they could not possibly exist without this
money. Ideologies are irrelevant – where is the money! The have used this
money to turn inefficient dictatorship into efficient dictatorships, ineffective
armies into effective instruments of control and repression. They don’t care
about the people whose standard of living has not changed one iota (if anything
it went down); they only care about achieving Control.
In that process, they have
not only pumped enormous sums into developing countries, they have actually
depleted the wealth of the developed countries which is also part of the
plan. In many ways they simply waste money to artificially lower our living
standards. A strong country will resist control. A weak country however, where
people are hungry and have no shelter, will be much easier to control.
What then is the ultimate
objective of the banking cartel? It is the establishment of the New World
Order with one Military (UNO, the Blue Helmets and Nato), one World Court,
one World Taxing Authority, one World Currency and one World Government. This is
their ultimate objective – the Brave New World revisited. And they are almost
there. What we are witnessing today which is falsely labelled a world credit
crisis is purposefully engineered as the final step in the consolidation of
world financial power before the New World Order will finally descend on all
of us.
Ladies and gentlemen, make
no mistake these people are scientists and are brilliant in what they are
doing. They have not become what they are by being idiots. They are the
highly trained Masterminds who prepare the New World Order in front of our eyes
and we don’t even see it. It is time to wake up, ladies and gentlemen, before it
is too late. And time is running out faster than you might think.
This is what all of this is
about: to consolidate the wealth of the world into their hands and to use this
wealth for control of the world. Nothing less than that: we are witnessing today
the final act in an unfolding drama of historic proportions wherein a tiny group
of people will soon rule the entire world.
And if all of the above
objectives for some unimaginable reason do not bring about the desired results,
they can still resort to yet another weapon at their disposal which has been
used most effectively in the past century: a new World War. In the same
way that World War I was used to break with the old world and jump-start FIAT
economies and World War II to overcome the Great Depression (which incidentally
was caused by the arising of FIAT economies following World War I), World War
III might well become necessary to prepare the grounds for the New World Order
should all of the above measures fail to bring about the desired results.
This is where all of this is
headed. In the light of the above, we simply cannot afford to remain complacent.
Now we have to ask another legitimate question: what, if anything, can we
still do.
4. Sharia Economics and
Real Money
First, we obviously have to
move away from FIAT Money (money made out of nothing) towards REAL
Money (money with intrinsic value). Why is this so important? Because the
core function of money is that of a temporary store of value to preserve
purchasing power over long periods of time, and FIAT money is simply a terrible
store of value as recent history has shown us again and again. Just think of
what has happened to the Reichsmark after World War II – it devalued to nothing
in a matter of months.
REAL Money: today,
the increasing influence of speculative investors in the bullion market
projects a distorted picture of wild swings in the ‘price’ of bullion (as
measured in paper currencies). In the past, when gold and silver were
currencies, their inflation-adjusted price in terms of today’s dollars did not
change over long periods of time. The only changes in the ‘price’ of bullion
resulted from changes in supply and demand patterns. This happened for example
when Christopher Columbus discovered the Americas, thereby enabling the massive
‘repatriation’ of gold and silver to Europe and thus increasing the supply side
within a stable demand environment. The obvious result was a slow and gradual
decline in the inflation-adjusted paper value of bullion over several hundred
years.
Only when true FIAT
currencies came into being in the 20 century (before that, all FIAT currencies
were at least fractionally backed by gold and silver), became the price of
bullion exposed to rapidly changing fluctuations. These fluctuations in the
paper-value of bullion are the direct result of the diminishing role of gold
and silver as currency:

-
In 1477
(before the discovery of the Americas), bullion prices were at their
highest: an ounce of silver stood inflation-adjusted at 806 USD and an
ounce of gold at 12’000 USD (historically, the gold/silver ratio varied
narrowly between 1/15 and 1/16)
-
In 1992,
an ounce of silver stood at 4.7 USD, an ounce of gold at 270 USD and
the gold/silver ratio was 1/57
I am often asked how gold
and silver can be used as investment instruments. This question reveals a basic
misconception of the role of bullion and stems from our focus on interest-based
and speculative profits where money is used to make money. Gold and silver are
stores of value and not investment instruments. It is thus not possible
to earn a ‘return’ on gold and silver. It is however possible to protect one’s
wealth over extended periods of time without having to fear loss of purchasing
power.
What does this mean for
halal investment practices?
First, it implies the use of
REAL rather than FIAT Money. In the Koranic interpretation,
all FIAT money is haram - the only permissible money must have intrinsic value
and must be based on gold and silver.
Secondly, we have to move
away from commercial banking practices to Sharia-compliant investments. Why?
Because first and foremost, Sharia economics forbids the use of money
to make money! What does this imply?
It means for example that
more than 600 trillion USD worth of derivatives, which represent almost
20 times the monetary value of the yearly global economic output, should be
redirected to the productive economy because today these instruments are
exclusively used to make money with money (which is haram and forbidden).
Just imagine for a moment what would happen if only a small part of this money
were invested into production and trade (at present, only a few trillion
USD out of the global money supply of > 600 trillion USD flow into the
productive economy). This would mean that ordinary people would finally reap the
benefits of their labour and risk-taking and that the flow of global capital
would reverse out of the hands of a very few into the hands of many.
Today, production has
been largely outsourced to developing countries to take advantage of
cheap labor costs and is widely considered ‘dirty’ and non-essential for
developed economies. Free trade (whatever little of it is left in the
face of the globally monopolized and cartelized flows of goods) has been
relegated as a form of tourist attraction to developing and third-world
economies.
In our modern economies, the
vast majority of all profits are either made by using money to make money (i.e.
through bets in the form of derivatives where one can even bet on the weather or
how soon Barack Obama is going to be killed once president – apart from being
sickening, this is worse than Roulette) or by collecting interest on
‘nothing-money’ loaned to governments, businesses and individuals. It is a total
reversal of the historic role of money away from the productive economy
to a purely financial economy. The economy of modern power centres such
as London or New York is mostly reduced to money making money. In these modern
power centres, one looks in vain for industrial production or free trade –
attributes which used to be the hallmark of the power centres of the past.
We therefore need to turn
away from the financial to the productive economy and must reverse the
harmful trend of using money to make money.
Second, Sharia
economics forbids any form of loans, be they interest-based or interest-free
(i.e. all loans are considered usurious). Let me explain this in more detail
since I get a lot of questions on this point (particularly why interest-free
loans are haram). In an interest-based loan, the lender gets an undue advantage
(or increase) because of the interest paid by the borrower. In an interest-free
loan, the borrower gets an undue advantage, because he uses the money of the
lender for his projects and pockets all the gains without letting the lender
participate in the benefits. In both cases, there is undue increase with one
side of the equation getting the short end of the stick. This is why all loans
are haram.
This implies that the
core business of modern banking (both commercial and Islamic banking),
namely the risk-free loaning of ‘nothing money’ against interest or guaranteed
profit, is haram: first because the banks use money created from nothing
to generate a massive and risk-free inflow of unearned wealth, and secondly,
because any risk-free profits, including loans of any kind, have been forbidden
since Biblical and Koranic times (please note that most so-called Islamic
instruments are as risk-averse as their commercial counterparts).
What then are Sharia
compliant investments?
As we have seen before,
Sharia-compliant investments must be based on REAL rather than FIAT Money. Some people argue that any commodity with intrinsic value can
serve as real money. Although this is correct from an academic point of view,
most commodities with the exception of bullion and oil do not own one essential
attribute of REAL Money: they are not universal. Since oil is
rather difficult to store for an average person and the only precious metals
available in sufficient quantities to serve as money are gold and silver, the
choice is self-evident.
Secondly, it implies that
all forms of financing must be based on shared profit/risk schemes where
the investor participates in the gain or loss of a project together with
the ‘borrower’ and where the ‘borrower’s’ seed assets are protected against
ex-appropriation. All types of modern loans therefore disqualify. In
interest-based banking, all collateralized assets go to the lender once interest
payments on a loan cannot be maintained (as we all know very well and might have
experienced ourselves), and the borrower looses his or her assets. In Sharia
compliant investments, this could never happen.
Sharia compliant investments
therefore must always be based on shared profit and risk and must extend into
the productive rather than the financial economy. This is the core attribute
of Sharia compliant investments, and on that attribute, we need to reconstruct a
new understanding of what correct financial investments really mean.
To close our discussion, we
need to consider what we as average citizens can do about all this. In a very
direct way, all of us can combat the usurers by not loaning money from them
and by putting pressure on our respective governments to increase their
fiscal responsibility and reign in their long-term obligations to the
banking cartel (because they incur debts on our backs). This is how all of us
can together begin to erode their power base and eventually bring them to their
knees. Why? Because the creation of all FIAT money starts with debt – in the
absence of debt, FIAT money cannot be created. Remember that in the very
beginning of my talk I pointed out that FIAT money comes into existence through
the creation of debt.
Ladies and gentlemen, we
still have time to fight. Even though time is quickly running out, we can still
meet as we do; we are still free to discuss the deconstruction of the world
financial system and the abolishment of Central Banking. But time is quickly
running out. If we continue to wait on the sidelines, we play into their hands.
Ladies and gentlemen, it is an all out war without mercy or consideration for
the enemy. If we don’t fight, we will most certainly become the victims. As
one of the founding fathers of the US constitution is on record to of saying:
why stand we here idle when our brethren are already in the field?
At the end of this
conference, Umar Vadillo will show you how this reconstruction can happen in the
practical setting of an Islamic government using Islamic money within the
context of Sharia-compliant investments.
Dr. Zeno
Dahinden