To the great
uneducated masses, democracy means universal franchise free to pick its
governing institution divided into two or more opposing parties. The media
instructed technical class also adhere to the creed that government should not
interfere with the market – the market being corporation-controlled distribution
and free markets meaning it is forbidden to inhibit global spread of corporation
over private entity. Wealth is not governed. Wealth does not spend itself on
people. The people pay for everything and are taxed for everything they buy or
drive or fly.
Now the wealth system
has collapsed, irretrievably and rationally. It is the people who are ordered to
pay the billions required to restore wealth to the wealthy. This operation can
only be accomplished by persuading the masses that in fact the operation is a
rescue from poverty not a recipe of endebtment.
In Visconti’s film
masterpiece of Lampedusa’s novel, ‘The Leopard’, the politics of power are laid
bare. The underlying law of governance is defined: “For things to remain the
same, everything must change.”
If the financial
system has collapsed then it means the democratic system has collapsed,
democracy’s function having been to separate government (controlling the masses)
from ‘market’, that is, commodity wealth – money itself, while worthless
intrinsically, having become a traded commodity.
By 2005 the monks of
the banking/investment orders knew that the inescapable end-game of futures and
hedge-fund systems was reaching mathematical meltdown. This meant that democracy
needed a mandate for the masses which could offer hope, salvation, rescue and
business as usual – in short, the dream would not die.
With superb expertise
the stage was prepared for the dream-regime, the dream leader and the brilliant
delusion of turning the end into the semblance of the beginning.
The ‘policy' of this
renewal was only one word. Why not? Millions had died and been displaced in Iraq
with only three letters – W.M.D.
The political mantra
was announced: “Change.”
However, it may be
that in the great nature of this upheaval it will not be ‘their’ business that
is renewed – but rather, that the whole system, money and its personnel – will
all be swept away. ‘Their’ change will not grant them a sameness.
The Second Hundred
Years War that started with the politicisation of wealth in South Africa in
1910, (the ‘solution’ of Dominion), finally has come to an end.
It has been the era
of the political class. The era of the rule by the servants of the banking elite
who, not the universal franchise, empowered them.
No concocted
mathematical (“economic”) rescue package can succeed – because the epoch of
democratic governance cannot be rescued. Banking cannot work without democracy.
However, the crisis in the political class is greater than that of finance.
Now we know that
paper money does not function – we also know that democratic personnel do not
function either. It is over. It is over. It is over.
Let us look out on
the terrain.
In Kenya – two party
politicians claim the Presidency. In order to win it they both let their own
people slaughter each other by tens of thousands. It is still unresolved.
In Zimbabwe – a
half-crazed President (“Zimbabwe is mine”) embodying socialist politics in pure
form, battles the opponent, he in turn, the appointee of American investment.
Their refusal to collaborate has produced million dollar inflation and a cholera
epidemic with over 1000 dead.
In Bangladesh – two
militant Begums battle for power, their policies identical – they have paralysed
the country for a decade.
In Greece – two
parties locked in conflict for two decades, the socialist Papandreou team
cursing the monetarist Karamanlis team. Now Greece approaches civil war.
It should be noted
that the party-system tends to produce an abortive monarchism sustaining a low
DNA-structured leadership – Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushes in the key Republican
state.
Blatant
non-functioning of the party system democracy is said to be because the country
is immature, but that cannot be sustained when you regard the European Union.
Britain’s Prime
Minister forced not only the country but the government itself into a war
neither wanted. The present holder of the office has never been chosen by the
electorate, that itself is a disgrace given the dictatorial powers achieved by
his predecessor.
Blair was seriously
in need of psycho-analysis. Brown is even more insecure as a Premier. He is
almost totally blind. Visiting heads of state are asked not to offer their hands
first in greeting as he may miss it. His corsets do not inspire confidence. His
upper dentures do not meet his lower dentures. He has some mysterious disability
which results in an uncontrollable dropping of his jaw. The pursed lips of his
smile suggest job losses more than pleasure. From the fear dilated eyes of Blair
to the blindness of Brown, however, the defining word is not ugliness. It is
inadequacy. Democratic leaders are not fit for high office. This is now
axiomatic. Inadequate. Brown – inadequate. Bush – inadequate. Merkel –
inadequate. Zapatero – inadequate.
How does this
inadequacy manifest?
Well! When the
complete financial system and its institutions collapsed at the end of 2007 –
the political leadership not only were surprised, they actually denied it at
first. They openly stated they did not know HOW it had happened. They offered no
solution. They adopted the bankers’ (the bankrupted bankers!) recommendation.
But there is a much
graver inadequacy. The worst aspect of the political class is its cowardice,
coupled with its supreme indifference to the slaughter of its own young men in
useless wars.
The refusal of a
government to go to the front-line in the event of a war, led by its President
and first ministers, should result in their overthrow or national and military
mutiny. They endlessly belittle the personal rule of the Monarch – but the
Monarch led the war and so did not squander generations as Asquith, Lloyd
George, Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Blair and Bush have done. Killers and
cowards. What more sickening sight in the world than Blair and Bush visiting
Iraqi soldiers, or Brown visiting Afghanistan. No wonder the French soldier
turned away from President Sarkozy as he laid medals on the coffins flown into
Paris from Afghanistan.
“Our boys at the
front – being killed!”
Our politicians at
the back – getting rich!
It is over. This is
the only positive result of the Gaza Massacre.
There is one other
important imbalance – inhumanity in the political class. Wagner said that
politics robbed a woman of her power as a woman. She was required to de-womanise
– become a pseudo-man. The very vital and sublime aspects of womanhood, her
life-confirming force, her compassion, her motherhood, her daughterhood, her
wifehood, her wisdom and her sense of reality – all these have to be smothered
if she is to enter the political class.
It is not an
accident, and certainly not a fashion choice, that forces political women into
trans-vestism.
The pant-suit as it
is called is the male-impersonator’s obligatory uniform in the world of
politics. From the US Secretary of State to the Chancellor of Germany it
represents a mandatory negation of feminism.
In relation to this
the banking elite is an all-male preserve with only one important top-level
woman banker – both her previous husbands (perhaps to her credit) having died
mysteriously.
Mockery of
politicians is not intended to be frivolous. It is to emphasise that no small
business, let alone a corporation, would dream of employing them in a
responsible role. Politicians are the lowest creatures of the species. Neither
they nor their national nor their international institutions could halt the Gaza
Massacre. They could not mention the loss of hundreds of Palestinians without
alongside it measuring the handful of Israeli dead. No one dared to say the
ratio of human dead at one to a hundred was a terminal disaster to the social
nexus. Suspension from the U.N.O.? Sanctions against Israel? No. The politicians
do not represent the people. They are the servants of the banks.
Is it to remain like
this? Or is there to be a change? And that brings us to Barak Obama. What a
brilliant piece of casting. It is truly Oscar material.
Nothing is what it
seems.
The name is Muslim.
The religion is evangelical christian. He calls himself black. His mother was
white. He is a kind of political Michael Jackson. The record label in both cases
is jewish.
“For things to remain
the same – everything must change.”
The myth that the
American Dream (who invented that?) might continue – the proof had come – a
black President.
The truth – the
historical truth of America has not and cannot be confronted, just as South
Africa’s new regime cannot confront its truth.
Barak Obama is not
black. He is brown. The christian state could not survive its own cultural
inheritance. The Southerners were ashamed of what they called miscegenation. The
Oxford Dictionary defines it: “Miscegenation – mixture of races, esp. the sexual
union of whites with negroes.” Equally, the protestant christian Afrikaners were
ashamed. The segregation was the futile attempt to prevent the nordic whites
breeding with the blacks. It was sinful! In its first context it was the
scenario of race superiority. Today we face a new scientific ethos. The black
and the nordic races are both in genetic decline. The vast HIV-hyphen-AIDS
politique hides the genetic breakdown of black communities. On the other hand –
the (apartheid designated) ‘mixed’ race thrives, superior to both its favoured
neighbours, leaders in sport and in intellect. In the modern world the ‘brown’
child of ‘mixed’ parentage represents a genetic rescue partnership producing a
new, dynamic and superior generation – or re-generation. The failure to face up
to this is dooming South Africa to a black empowerment doctrine (which cuts out
the still ‘shamed’ coloureds) that has had to lower not only academic standards,
university admission and medical qualifications, but airline pilot exam
standards!
In the USA the
never-confronted issue of the politically but not economically freed slaves hid
the deepest perhaps incurable wound – unless rescued by Islam – that the new
population of the future was brown babies. The language of Afro-American
politics is the language of a failed state. The USA was a state that in 1861,
according to the Oxford Dictionary, was a nation talking of its citizens as:
“‘Octoroons’ – a person having one-eighth negro blood, the offspring of a
quadroon and a white.” The USA was the father of Nazi Germany and Apartheid
South Africa. And nothing has changed – but now we are told by the politicians
“change is coming.”
Change by a man who
cannot deny white and black in order to declare the genetic good news, or the
political good news that he is neither jew nor christian, but the son of a
Muslim? Alas. He has donned the jewish cap, kneeling in the racist christian
church – “For things to remain the same.”
He has expressed his
“grave concern” for Palestinian and Israeli loss of life. That is the mantra of
the jewish French President, the jewish French Foreign Minister and the jewish
English Foreign Minister. It is the mantra of Obama’s brilliant ex-Israeli Chief
of Staff. A real man would say that massacre of 100 for 1 is a pagan brutality
and to accept it is the end of our whole society.
The war against
Palestine by Israel is not judaism versus Islam. Israel’s holy city is New York
and Hamas’ holy city is Kerbala, but Israel is killing Palestinians to prevent
the destruction of Israeli jewry by Arab blood. It is not their rockets or their
tunnels that they
fear, it is their penis and their womb. They fear that the quadroon will give
way to the octoroon, and racist jewry will disappear forever as it is already
disappearing, despite Hollywood, in the USA.
If Barak Obama cannot
open the gates of reality in Israel what chance will he have to be able to open
the gates of poverty in the USA – to let its black and brown population into the
white bedroom of the future?
For such a
transvaluation of values Barak Obama would need to enter Islam. That would be
renewal. All we will have is “change.”