In a recent interview on French television, the most renowned defence lawyer and jurisprudent of our time, Maitre Vergès, emphatically denounced the ease with which democratic Western intellectuals accuse third world and poor countries of human rights abuses. He insisted that the democratic States today are more guilty of human rights violations than any State in the rest of the world. Democracy has become the licence to void a people of those civic freedoms it once boasted it existed to defend.

The question thinking people must ask today is this: why do the leaders of the wealth-regime, the G8, denouncing Mugabe in Zimbabwe – who, admittedly, may be degenerating into a terminal psychopathic condition – continue not just passively but overtly and didactically to support the democratically engineered dictatorships of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan?

It should also be noticed than in these Asian republics, the final cynicism of democratic government is openly revealed. In each one of them a relative seeks or struggles to establish dynastic continuity. So it is that a kind of inverted monarchism has become the mark of our age. Dynastic monarchy was founded on serious genealogical principles by which legitimacy, child-training, and political marriage assured the continuity of the dynasty and the expansion of the governed territory. Today the numbers system, a lottery of numerical chance, from within a stable of competitors whose common factor is their ideological correctness, lets the masses choose from among that scum of the earth that raises itself only by the force of political ambition. Assad of Syria has led to Bashir Assad in the Presidency. The ageing Mubarak has already prepared for his son to inherit Egypt. George Bush Senior led to the dismal George Bush Junior. The structured monarchism of the Kennedies was only eliminated by assassination and scandal. The Bhuttos after Zulfiqar saw power pass to the daughter, who in turn murdered her brother. Now her son has dumped his father’s name to take on legally his mother’s.

Yet this statal insanity which democracy produces is not an infection reserved for the Orient. The British Government, under its near-blind Prime Minister, of no known national investiture, continues a sure path to anarchy, blithely enacting that purge of civic rights legislation initiated by Blair.

The British Foreign Secretary is utterly incapable of behaving, let alone acting, like the voice of a great nation’s foreign policy. His capacities would be stretched if appointed floor manager of Marks & Spencer’s. The British Home Secretary would never be promoted beyond the typing pool of any reliable Corporation. The superb spokeswoman of the Police Federation expressed the dismay of all her members at having to deal with such a level of incompetence in a government minister. Beneath the justified discontent about police pay there lies a hidden and unspoken concern among our police force. During the Blair regime, funds were leached from, and finally blocked from, the National police force and its framework. They became seconded to a vastly inflated Security apparatus which was then empowered by massive funding.

Thus it was that while a hidden army went searching for an openly declared 10,000 known terrorist suspects, the streets of Britain, unprotected by an impoverished and embittered police force, began to decline rapidly into anarchy. While the Security services were reduced to making unsubstantiated arrests, loudly announced only later to be discreetly released, and perhaps even forced to stage set-up cells guided by “agents provocateurs” – the knife became the weapon of choice of the socially dispossessed and alienated. A west-indian christian youth terrorism emerged which then spread out to a lost white middle-class generation.

With 14,000 knife victims admitted to hospital within the last year and 34 people a day taken to hospital with stab wounds, now at the beginning of summer there is almost a murder every day.

Knife amnesties, parent fines, more ghastly social workers – none of these tricks will change the situation. The cutting-back of secret-service funding, and a government order to them to re-direct their services to Chinese industrial sabotage and the Camorra’s infiltration of the imported goods market, as well as Russian industrial espionage – all that is necessary. Alongside this we have the right to expect recognition of the British Muslim Community’s stabilising effect on civic society, and its significant financial presence in business affairs.

A General Election with an accomplished young team under a man of moral conviction and clear thinking now blessedly free of his rogue dinosaur David Davis, may grant the country a time of peace and expansion, once the lawless NATO force is voided of its British cannon-fodder, in that struggle which has nothing, absolutely nothing of benefit for our nation. A Cameron government at home, and peace abroad, may rescue Britain from its current rapid decline into civic anarchy. And as the once noble Anglican Church crumbles into Americanism, leaving behind its Henrician foundation, (which was, “the theology is not the issue, but the upholding of the National State”), at the same time Britain can open to a new society whose vitality and renewal will come from its Muslim core, as it once was revived by Normans, and before that, by Viking Danes. This is our Du‘a for a future of growth.