It was historically inevitable and it was politically inevitable that the NATO puppet Musharraf would meet his nemesis in conflict with the State’s highest judiciary. Inevitable, because the leading office-holder of the judiciary in his person embodies the law of the State and its justice, while the Pretender to Presidency embodies the overthrowing of the law of the State and the imposition of injustice to the people of Pakistan.

In terms of the philosophy of democracy he represents the fascist overthrow of an elected government by military putsch. In terms of the science of geo-politics he represents the classical insertion of a pre-trained native to uphold the doctrines and policies of a foreign, invasive and imperial entity. The classical modern examples of this were Hitler’s placing Field Marshal Pétain as his governor of France, and the politician Quisling as his governor of Norway. In terms of Islamic Law there seems a powerful case to have him declared kafir, and to this end a panel of judges should examine his case and test him against the unarguable authority of the Fataawa ‘Aalmgheeri. In terms of the important and powerful operating model of ‘Amal in Muslim society, he must at the least be considered Munafiq.

As an openly committed Ataturkist, or Kemalist, he is bound by that policy which necessitates an atheist State and an atheist judiciary. A necessary clause in a Kemalist ruler’s contract is that he will on no account make war on a foreign State, but will uphold a policy of open war against his own people, should they try to abolish the Kemalist contract. This has proved fatal to the destiny of the Turkish people, which stands by helpless to intervene in the matter of its former colonies, now Israel, Syria and Iraq, while its Kemalist junta still put tanks around the mosques and remain the unchallenged assassins of great ‘ulema and intellectuals.

Since the coup d’état, under orders, of Musharraf, this too has been the case in Pakistan. On the one hand he has clearly indicated that he intends a programme of total acquiescence to India’s imperial demand for the Muslim land of Kashmir. On the other hand he has personally supervised a systematic pattern of assassination of enormously revered and respected ‘ulema, as well as staging street confrontations to permit his private civilian army to fire indiscriminately on Pakistani citizens. War against one’s own people is an inescapable clause of the Kemalist programme.

Although he uses significant quantities of so-called Foreign Aid to prop up a regime that has a vanishing support from the masses of the people, he has clearly failed to deliver the goods to his masters. Since the invasion of the northern Muslim provinces above the Khyber Pass by a foreign army of mercenaries, that same foreign force has adopted a regrettably successful technique of dividing Muslim social energies into separate political groupings which they and their media have invented in their opposition to Islam.

The first major divide, certainly the most dangerous of all, actually involved a joining in order to create a division. Attacked by two religions, it suited them to join the two into one religion. First attacked by the Shi‘a in Iran, they then found themselves attacked by the Muslims in Afghanistan. Then in Iraq they found they were being attacked by the Shi‘a, previously oppressed under Saddam, but were also being attacked by the Muslims, who had previously abandoned Islam under Saddam. Truly, as in the famous Hadith, Allah uses the enemies of the Deen to advance the Deen. Just as the Shi‘a religion had awakened under its military leader Sadr, so too, after years of easy atheist living, the ex-Saddamites re-discovered their religion and were quickly recognised as being insurgents. It was of course a re-surgence.

It is only the ghastly deviation from Islamic Law which constitutes using young people as suicide vehicles that stands as an absolute barrier preventing the world’s two billion Muslims from openly rallying to support all these many causes now festering in the world today. In an Islamic Court of Law, a man found guilty of booby-trapping a Muslim would be found guilty of murdering that Muslim, and he would be asked before sentence was passed, why he did not do it himself, and what were his reasons.

We have indicated that the first idea of division to weaken us was to suggest then that we were a religion with a sectarian divide. Now, Allah the Great has declared in Surat al-Ma’ida (5:3):

Today the kuffar have despaired of overcoming your deen.
So do not be afraid of them but be afraid of Me.
Today I have perfected your deen for you
and completed My blessing upon you
and I am pleased with Islam as a deen for you.

When that Ayat was revealed, Khilafa was not an issue, and inherited leadership was not an issue. Anything that bases itself on other than that then-completed religion has to be, by definition, another religion. For example, the wahhabis accuse us as Sufis of certain Bida‘. The Sufis from their side accuse the wahhabis of other Bida‘. Both have a limited case of things that need correcting. Therefore we, both groups, continually pray behind each other. Doctrinally, if a Shi‘a prays behind us they consider his prayer invalid and a matter of strategic deception. Thus, they are the separatists, not us. One of the urgent necessities of our time is a strong Muslim Da’wa to the Shi‘a calling them from the cult of the worship of family inheritance.

On a world scale, the invention of a world terrorist network called Al-Qaeda is a superb fiction almost on a level with H. G. Wells’ invented threat of an invasion from Mars. Orson Welles proved that the American public could run amok in undirected terror at the threat of a Martian invasion, and perhaps, therefore, we should see him and not Bin Laden as the father of Al-Qaeda. Of course, this organisation had a tiny and fragile connection to Islam. Its founder was from Arabia yet was utterly unschooled in Fiqh and Kalam. From the moment their first activities emerged, and even in their climactic moment, there never once issued from them a single call to Islam, a single Ayat of Qur’an, or a single invocation of the Messenger, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. From the beginning their discourse revealed them to be quite simply anti-American Arabs. Their recruits, far from being drawn from a dynamic and educated elite, proved to have been drawn from the lower depths of society. The news that the men who executed the destruction of the Twin Towers spent their last night with prostitutes drinking vodka-sours scarcely inspires a call to a higher cause. The whole phenomenon, devoid as it was of any known Islamic content, any known Islamic programme, any known parameters of Islamic Law, would certainly have fizzled out as all nihilist movements do, in accordance with their classical historical precedents.

If it had not been for the Banker Sect ending up convinced that the existence of Al-Qaeda as a world Islamic threat presented them with a Bull Market, and that there was chance of a national leveraged buy-out, there would have been no invasion of Iraq. We, the Muslims, then had to submit to the distasteful process by which media “experts” and out-of-work academics who did not know what to do with their politics degrees suddenly emerged on TV and authoring books, telling us who these terrorists were. Only this week on CNN a girl, barely out of college, was presented as a senior spokesman of something called the Heritage Foundation. Speaking in a very low-class English, she informed the viewers that the vast menace of Islamic terrorists in Britain had not been confronted by the British Government. Ernst Jünger, in his great mid-twentieth century analyses of modern capitalism and its State crises, indicated that it was in the nature of that capitalism to absorb into itself any militant rebel force, one necessary to it for its ongoing existence, so that when it was crushed, the State would itself invent it. Paralysis of a series of international airports, evacuation of terminals, midnight swoops by Special Forces, arrests, charges and dismissals which never see the courts. This is what the bemused two billion Muslims face and only now begin to protest.

Since the Al-Qaeda signifier has begun to look more and more like the very Conspiracy Theory that the capitalist ethos has defined as paranoia, it has been necessary to keep applying the divide-and-conquer technique over and over. The fundamentalists, the Islamists, the Hizbi-this and the Hizbi-that, Hamas, the Ikhwan, the Askar, or even, simply, the insurgents – never the World Muslim Community. Never the Ummah. Even the little dwarf in Rome, with his twisted mouth and his Prada slippers, can denounce us as war-like. No mention from him that his predecessors sent out teams to assassinate Elizabeth I of England, or quietly folded their hands in prayer as the millions went into the concentration camps in World War II. It was enough for the dictator of Uzbekistan to say when he massacred hundreds of his own citizens, men, women and children, that they were Islamists for the USA and EU to turn their heads away, and for Soros to continue his fiduciary activity.

In the matter of Pakistan, the dog Musharraf can no longer say it is the Islamists or Al-Qaeda, or even the long-dead Bin Laden whose ghost he claims to hunt – none of these are the enemy. The enemy of Musharraf is Pakistan. The people of Pakistan. The dictator cannot win, as he has defied the lawyers. A Party which defies the lawyers, by the same token, cannot win. The Army has got to intervene. The excremental presence of Musharraf must be shovelled out of the Presidential Palace. In order to protect the lives of its citizens, the Army is morally, Islamically, and even democratically obliged to remove him. The political argument would insist on the restoration of the illegally deposed Prime Minister, although the pragmatics of the present anarchy may not permit it. In that event, the Army must recover the dignity of the world Muslim nation and set up a working governance that speaks for all the people and not for the wealth-elite of Karachi and the cities. Pakistan is a great nation whose new generation represent a spectacular gift to the world of intellectual capacity and genius – one man stands in the way of them fulfilling in their lives the gifts that Allah has given them. It falls to the High Command of the Army, once again, to rescue the nation, its self-respect, and its future.

We ask Allah to give to the leadership of the country, to its army and its judiciary and its ‘ulema power to remove the dictator, uniquely representing as he does, foreign forces inimical to the great State of Pakistan.