|
In the light of the sickening
massacre of the innocents in the Caucasus, it is of
profound importance that we do not allow our natural
revulsion to confuse our intellects about the kind of
world in which we are now living.
It is to our shame that we have
permitted the kafir hegemony to give, unchallenged, the
name ‘Islamic’ to the phenomenon of Terrorism. It is a
matter of some urgency that we now insist on
distinguishing between Muslims, of whatever disposition,
and the Divinely revealed Deen of Islam, and at the same
time we must fiercely remind the kafir power and media
system that these anarchic monsters have been spawned by
them so that both their history and their DNA bear the
mark of kufr.
In Iraq, the contradictions stand
openly for all the world to see. We know that the Ba’ath
Party was a product of christian socialism, spawned by
Michael Aflak of Lebanon. We know that Saddam was
annually greeted by the Pope and hailed as the liberator
of the Arabs from Islam. We know that the first victims
of Saddam were the Muslim Ulama, and his first
collaborators the christians and the Shi’a, the latter,
of course, only up to the Iran war. It is the kafir
media which has created a fictive sociology for Iraq
with a Kurdish North, a Sunni centre and a Shi’a South.
They refuse to delineate Iraq as a Muslim territory with
a Shi’a South. The ethnicity of the Kurd is a shameless
concession to the Kemalist Turkish state, obliged by its
atheist doctrines not to define Kurds as Muslims. After
the dark decades of Saddam, how could there possibly be
any Islam in Iraq? We are told that ‘Sunni Muslim’ ulama
have given a Fatwa ordering the release of the French
hostages. Who are these men? How is it they are still
alive? To have survived must mean that they were
Saddamites. It is clear that the USA intends to hand
over Iraq to a Shi’a future and it is this that has
inspired a post-Saddamite nationalist rebellion,
alongside a wahhabi-anarchist terrorism outrageously
under the banner of Islam.
Before we turn to that most important
matter, the defence and propagation of Islam in our
time, we are forced to look at the dreadful massacre of
the children. No-one will argue but that legally there
are two guilty and responsible parties. Firstly, the
primitive un-educated youths so devoid of reason and
emotion that they could do such a thing. Secondly, that
more dreadful group of adults who condemn so many in
this grisly event. Yet, given the nature of Kufr, we
must stubbornly refuse to find ourselves standing next
to Putin and his regime in the outrageous posture of
their moral indignation.
Do not forget that in the last decade
one third of the entire population of Chechnya has been
slaughtered. There has been a no-questions policy
towards murder, rape and looting. There has been the
sickening silence of the European Union.
Let us look more closely. The
President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, was a former KGB
agent who proudly identified himself as a ‘Chekist’. As
Anne Applebaum in her monumental study ‘Gulag’ said:
‘Earlier, when serving as the Russian Prime Minister,
Putin had made a point of visiting Lubyanka on the
anniversary of the Cheka’s founding, where he dedicated
a plaque to the memory of Yuri Andropov (The former head
of the KGB and President).’ Applebaum notes that the
numbers who died in the Gulag right up until the
collapse of the system, soar beyond the known statistics
to figures between 12 and 15 million. Courtois, Werth,
Panne, Paczkowski, Bartosek and Margoin, the French
authors of ‘The Black Book of Communism’ published by
Harvard, place the figure at 20 million dead, and
remember that the Camps continued into the 80’s.
Russia’s great poet Anna Akhmatova explained the real
situation of the Russian population. It is a devastating
diagnosis. She wrote, ‘Two Russias are eyeball to
eyeball. Those who were in prison — and those who put
them there.’ In 1967 the Russian poet Boris Chichibabin
wrote this poem:
As if
the dead alone had mattered
And those who vanished nameless in the north.
The evil he implanted in our hearts,
Had it not truly done the damage?
As long as poverty divides from wealth
As long as we don’t stop the lies
And don’t unlearn to fear
Stalin is not dead.
The deep structure of this recent
massacre goes down into the very foundations of the
present Russian State. It is the disgraceful Russian
populace who have to confront almost a century of
deception, lies, mutual betrayal and nauseating
passivity in the light of decades of mutual
denunciation, a secret-police ethos, and a continuing
Gulag social nexus. For 50 years generations of German
youths have been systematically humiliated and chastised
for the Nazi concentration camps, and who can blame
those who told them so? In South Africa, State
Commissions have probed and documented the, up until
then, little known crimes of the Apartheid regimes. Not
one perpetrator of a whole century’s crimes in Russia
has been called to account. The State has shown no
interest in un-masking the people’s shameful past. When
the Soviet system collapsed, Stalin’s death and the deep
inherent contradictions of the system along with the
follies of Cold War economics being the main causes, a
series of crises followed. The military’s attempt to
seize the day failed to block the American-backed
programme to present the alcoholic Yeltsin as a new
Democrat. He just had time to hand over the commodity
wealth of the nation to the notorious group of jewish
adventurers, euphemistically called the Oligarchs.
Within a few years they had almost complete control of
the wealth of the nation. However, after the failure of
the army, the real power system of Russia emerged from
its torture basements, the all-pervasive, highly
systematised KGB. They wittily changed their name but
not their personnel. Yeltsin was forced to take their
man as PM. So it was that the new Tsar of Russia turned
out to be a middle-ranking KGB agent. A Russian friend
explained it to me: ‘He was a between-floors man. He
supervised the torture in the basement and then went
upstairs to report his assessment to his bosses.’
The numbed and abject response of
Europe to the grim posturing of the Putin regime heralds
a new darkness in the gloom of current world affairs.
Mired in immorality, the Blair regime already houses
three Oligarchs, two of whom happily launder their money
through English football clubs, while English Tommys
pointlessly die in Iraq. France can do nothing,
pre-occupied as it is with setting up a supra-national
elite military force to take definitive possession of
Saharan uranium, gold and oil while pretending to defend
the desert sands against a non-existent Islamic army.
Against the seemingly endless web of contradictions we
have to turn from the media frenzy of passions and the
stunning confusion of the kafir society which cannot
face up to its own fundamental reality and ask — How can
they believe in humanism, and humanly elected
government, when now we know what humans do?
Against this background, I propose
the following delineations:
Firstly, a clear distinction must be
made between the actions of Muslims and the Deen of
Islam. Nothing emerging from a hidden source of
leadership and devoid of a visible Jama'at, can
constitute a defence of the Deen due to the mass
betrayal of the Arab peoples, and their eager adoption
of both kafir systems of government and the more
shocking acceptance of the hallucinating kafir doctrines
of Finance. Not only is the usury system of banking the
enthusiastic domain of the Arab so-called reformers but
they have granted a servile submission to doctrines of
unjust taxation.
Islam is Deen al-Haqq. There are not
two Islams. We totally reject the term ‘Sunni Islam’.
Allah, Glory be to Him, says: Al‑Maida (5.3)

Today
the kuffar have despaired of overcoming your Deen.
So do not be afraid of them but be afraid of Me.
Today I have perfected your Deen for you
And completed My blessing upon you
And I am pleased with Islam as a Deen for you.
This means, of course, that we do not
recognise a Shi’a Islam. They themselves are the first
to admit this since they have named themselves as
separatists. Because of the many similar elements in the
Shi’a religion they should not be regarded as an enemy,
but a significant and important neighbour to whom we
must make Da’wa.
Secondly, since it has become
increasingly clear that the Arab peoples have lived over
half a century without Islamic teaching and governance,
and more importantly without Zakaat and a halal
financial system, it must also be assumed that by and
large, with obvious individual exceptions, the Arabs
have not only gone out of Islam, but turned against it.
Since it is now clear that the modalities of terrorism
are rapidly strengthening the atheist world hegemony, as
capitalism moves into its final phase, it is time to
call on these misguided youths to be true to their own
fitrah and recoil from the irrationality of an anarchic
politique and begin to see their own destinies in a more
exalted light.
The enemy’s weaponry is not military
hardware. It is Finance, usury Finance. Destruction of
property and murder of innocents assure the further
strengthening of the kafir finance system of which
Insurance is an active arm. It is in the restoration of
Zakaat and in the exaltation of Allah (and this does not
mean funeral mobs shouting Allahu-Akbar!) that we will
find success.
Historically there is every excuse
and explanation for the acts of terror now being
perpetrated. From a Ruhani point of view, however, this
cannot continue. We say to you what Maulana Rumi, may
Allah be pleased with him, said: ‘Come back! Come back!
A thousand times come back!’ To begin the dialogue we
offer the following questionnaire —
1) Do you accept the Absolute revelation of
the Qur’an, uncreated and from the Exalted, on
the tongue of the Angel Jibreel into the heart
of the Rasul, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace?
2) Do you accept that the Messenger is the
last and the Seal of the Messengers who brings
the final Shari’at of Divine Ordinance with both
Allah’s revelation to the Messenger, and with
the Messenger’s Sunna, guided by Allah?
3) Do you accept that Allah is One, with
nothing associated with Him, Exalted above
comparison or likeness, and that He has Names
indicating His Action in creation and the
Unseen, Attributes indicating that He is the
Living, Knowing, Seeing, Hearing, Willing and
Determining, First and Last, Outward and Inward,
Near and Present and that He is One, Indivisible
in His Essence and its Supreme
otherness-from-all-created-things?
4) Do you agree that by this contract you
must obey Allah and obey the Messenger?
5) Do you recognise the 5 pillars as
designated by the Rasul, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace? —
That there is no god except
Allah,
That our master Muhammad, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace,
is the Messenger of Allah,
That 5 prayers are binding for
each day.
That the Fast is obligatory every
Ramadhan.
That Zakaat must be taken,
assessed and collected by the
acceptable agents of an Amir.
That the Hajj to Arafat and the
House of Allah is a binding duty to
those able in their lifetime.
Is this confirmed?
6) Do you accept that Qur’an, being a
Protected Book, must be used with proper
intellectual discipline to prevent distortion
and contradictions, that is, confirm that there
are two kinds of Ayats, Mutashabihat, i.e.
metaphoric and explaining ayats, and Muhakamat
ayats, ayats with binding legal instruction or
hukm?
That Ilm-an-Nuzul protects the Book from
invention, magic or Ta’wil, ‘hidden’
Interpretations? That the tafsirs of ibn Atiyya
and ibn Juzay or ibn Kathir defend the fact that
the Shari’at is embedded in the Book’s blessed
ayats and that they protect the Qur'an from the
atheist/mushrik views of false rationalism and
mutazzili separatism? That there are Abrogated
and Abrogating ayats within it?
7) Do you accept the noble primacy of the
Khulafa Rashidun, may Allah be pleased with
them?
8) Do you accept that there is no mosque over
any other mosque except the Haramayn of Makkah
and Madinah?
9) Do you accept that while Muslims are
entitled to fight when deprived of homes and
homeland, that Jihad, fisabilillah, is another
matter with its own strict rules, requirements
and inhibitions as set out and practised by the
Rasul, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
and Allah’s Book?
10) Do you accept that the Deen was perfected
and completed as defined in the Blessed Ayat and
that it has always been a matter of an open
Jama’at with a leader openly having taken bayat
following a noble Sunna, and that it can neither
govern nor guide as a secret, hidden society?
That the Deen is not based on the Prayer of
Danger, but on the Prayer of Jumu’a, as its
communal Fard?
11) Do you accept that the forced collection
of Zakaat requires the Islamic Dinar of gold and
Dirham of silver as was the practice of the
people of Madinah and this great world Muslim
community until the collapse of the governments
in Delhi and Istanbul and the East?
12) Do you accept that anywhere your small
troop functions there has never been a
collection, nor a payment by any leadership
of Zakaat, public and visible? That you have no
Jama’at?
13) Do you accept that you have never called
a single kafir to the Deen openly and publicly?
14) Do you accept that the Muslims are not
safe from you and that you do not ransom their
safety with your life’s blood?
15) Do you accept that Allah did not set
America, Russia and Europe against the Arab
nations, nor East against West, but rather
distinguished between Muslim and kafir, those
who trust and those who reject, and beyond them
a third group - the hypocrites?
16) Lastly, do you accept that the Rasul, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, governed by
love from his people?
He wept ‘Oh my Ummah! My Ummah.’ Babur, may
Allah be pleased with him, governed by love.
AbdalHamid Khan II, may Allah be pleased with
him, governed by love. They followed the Blessed
Divine Order — they were gentle to the mu’minun
and harsh to the kafirun.
When will your hearts break and turn
in Tawba to Allah and ask for His mercy to enter into
you and fill you with Trust in Him and Obedience to Him
so that you may become a mercy for all the worlds?
La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah
|