|
|

 |
|
Saudi Failure at Hajj
by Shaykh Dr. Abdalqadir
As-Sufi
|
|
17/02/2004 |
The appalling death toll of the Hajjis at Mina is the
unique responsibility of the Saudi regime.
The case
against the Saudi family and its system has got three distinct
strands which must be understood. The first strand of evidence
against the Saudis lies in the grim statistics of Hajj deaths
under their authority. There has been a series of disastrous
Hajjes, including the horrific statistic where thousands were
killed at the same spot about thirty years ago. The dismal
failure of the regime to facilitate the Hajj, on site, is one
aspect of the matter. It follows from this that since the weak
point of the Hajj logistically has been the Stoning, it is
quite clear that the Saudis simply have not dealt with this
completely soluble technological problem.
However, the
second strand of culpability is equally causal to the
disaster. The wahhabi regime has always had an ambiguous and
uncomfortable relationship with the Hajj itself. On the one
hand it is an absolutely necessary annual boost to the Saudi
economy, which has always served to cover the wild
extravagance of the rulers and the failure of their social
services. In order to increase the number of Hajjis the regime
sent out Mutawwifs and their agents all round the world
targeting distant and poverty-stricken areas where the Hajj
catchment would net those once-in-a-lifetime Hajjis who would
thus come to Arabia with their life-savings. This has led in
turn to extending Saudi corruption into Muslim nations. The
Anwar Ibrahim - Dr. Mahathir scheme of the Hajj Fund has seen
the creation of a usurious institution, utterly haram both in
its principles and its method. On the other hand, alongside
this marketing of the Hajj there has been a further corrupt
institution, which is the National Allocation strictly
controlling the numbers of Hajjis that may come from a
particular country. This statistical application is not only
illegal for us, but it is prejudicial. The most blatant
example of this injustice is the small allocation allowed to
Turkey, which is an all-Muslim nation. Just as in Soviet
Russia the constitutional allocation per district of permitted
numbers for the KGB to put under arrest, far from reducing the
number of victims found the local police obliged to "meet
their quotas", so if they were allowed a thousand victims and
they only had ten guilty ones, they would go out and make up
the numbers with the innocent, so in the same way the Hajj
allocations also invite to the "stuffing of the statistics".
Without this systematic interlinking of structural systems the
number of Hajjis would be radically reduced.
The third
strand is of grave significance to this Saudi regime in its
last phase. All Muslims recall the uprising at the Ka'aba and
its termination effected by Fahd ibn Abdulaziz's recourse to
an elite French commando unit. This showed the world a double
crime against the Deen of Islam and the Muslim Nation.
Firstly, they had failed to protect the Ka'aba. Secondly, they
had desecrated it with kafir troops shedding Muslim blood
inside the Haram. Thirdly, the regime took advantage of this,
basically to wipe out the tribe of the Quraish from among whom
the rebel leader had come. The slaughter of Quraishi men,
women and children was not even a primitive vengeance caused
by Saudi humiliation, but by the perpetual underlying fear of
the regime that one day they as usurpers would be swept away
by the return of a Quraishi Khalifate.
Now we come to
the crime which resulted in the deaths of Hajjis this year.
The phrase, "adding insult to injury", could not be more
appropriate. That the Hajjis died is the unique responsibility
of the Saudi regime. Given their wealth and the means
available to them, this has no excuse, but the matter is much
more serious. The direct cause of the Hajjis' deaths was that
the rulers of the Arabian Peninsula saw fit to assign the
majority of their security forces to protect the terrified
cohort of the Saudi Princes. It was only after the event that
they pulled back the security guards and placed them where
they should have been, protecting the pilgrims.
After
the disaster of the Hajj uprising, and only then, did Fahd ibn
Abdulaziz take on himself the Khilafal title that was and
remains the property of Khilafa, "the Guardian of the
Haramayn". Having failed to guard it, he titled himself the
Guardian!
Following this year's disaster the insult
swiftly came. Significantly, not only the Minister of Hajj but
the Saudi prince in charge of security were dragged in front
of the world's cameras. Their pronouncement seemed to be based
on the assumption that the world's television audience was
even more stupid than they were. After a disaster involving
the death of hundreds, you do not appear on television saying
your government has done everything to protect the Hajjis and
tell us how much money you have spent on the matter, and most
insultingly of all, you do not openly imply that those Hajjis
who died were a primitive mob from underdeveloped countries.
They died because the security system of the Arabian Peninsula
is already in panic-stricken mode. It has already blown up a
compound of immigrant workers in order to claim that they too
are victims of a terrorism of which they are the authors and
the ongoing planners throughout the Muslim world. That same
security system knows perfectly well that the common people
living in Arabistan are poor, under-educated and in the desert
villages suffering from malnutrition. They know it is a
country on the edge of civil war. They also know that the
movement against them has come FROM them. They also know that
at the slightest hint of trouble, their darling guardians will
enter the country and it will prove an easier task than the
invasion of the atheist-christian-shi'a land of Iraq.
The conclusion of this terrible tragedy must be that
following all these disasters and the shame of the attack on
Makkah, for which they have never been called to account, the
Saudi regime is not fit to govern either the people of the
Arabian Peninsula or the Haramayn which do not belong to them,
have never belonged to them, and are the property of all the
Muslims.
|
|
|
 |
 |
© All
Rights Reserved - © 2004 Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi |